=======================================================================
Wake Up America
This is a comprehensive overview of the current world situation; factual,
analytical, and appears to be historically accurate. It will take a
while, but many have lived through many of the historical periods depicted and
are familiar with most of the others. Do yourself the best favor you can
and take the time to read this article. It is well written, it's just
long because it has to be. The author is a Northern California Lawyer -
his name and e-mail address are at the end of the article
---------------------
Sixty-three years ago, Nazi Germany had overrun almost all of Europe and
hammered England to the verge of bankruptcy and defeat, and had sunk more than
four hundred British ships in their convoys between England and America for
food and war materials.
Bushido Japan had overrun most of Asia, beginning in 1928, killing millions of
civilians throughout China, and impressing millions more as slave labor.
The United States was in an isolationist and pacifist mood, and most Americans
and Congress wanted nothing to do with the European war, or the Asian war.
Then along came Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, and in outrage Congress
unanimously declared war on Japan, and the following day on Germany, which had
not attacked us.
It was a dicey thing. We had few allies.
France was not an ally, for the Vichy government of France aligned with its
German occupiers. Germany was not an ally, for it was an enemy, and
Hitler intended to set up a Thousand Year Reich in Europe. Japan was not an
ally, for it was intent on owning and controlling all of Asia. Japan and
Germany had long-term ideas of invading Canada and
Mexico, and then the United States over the north and south borders, after they
had settled control of Asia and Europe. America's allies then were
England, Ireland, Scotland, Canada,
Australia, and Russia, and that was about it. There were no other
countries of any size or military significance with the will and ability to
contribute much of anything to the effort to defeat Hitler's Germany and Japan,
and prevent the global dominance of Nazism. And we
had to send millions of tons of arms, munitions, and war supplies to Russia,
England, and the Canadians, Aussies, Irish, and Scots, because none of them
could produce all they needed for themselves.
All of Europe, from Norway to Italy, except Russia in the east, was already
under the Nazi heel.
America was not prepared for war. America had stood down most of its
military after World War I and throughout the depression. At the outbreak
of World War II there were army soldiers training with broomsticks over their
shoulders because they didn't have guns, and
using cars with ''tank'' painted on the doors because they didn't have tanks.
And a big chunk of our navy had just been sunk and damaged at Pearl
Harbor.
Britain had already gone bankrupt, saved only by the donation of $600m given by
Belgium to England to carry on the war when Belgium was overrun by Hitler.
Actually, Belgium surrendered one day, because it was unable to oppose
the German invasion, and the Germans bombed Brussels into rubble the next day
anyway, just to prove they could.
Britain had been holding out for two years already in the face of staggering
shipping loses and the near-decimation of its air force in the Battle of
Britain, and was saved from being overrun by Germany only because Hitler made
the mistake of thinking the Brits were a relatively minor threat that could be
dealt with later and turning his attention to Russia, at a time when England
was on the verge of collapse in the late summer of 1940.
Russia saved America's rear by putting up a desperate fight for two years until
the United States got geared up to begin hammering away at Germany.
Russia lost something like 24 million people in the sieges of Stalingrad
and Moscow, 90% of them from cold and starvation, mostly civilians, but also
more than a million soldiers. More than a million!
Had Russia surrendered, then, Hitler would have been able to focus his entire
campaign against the Brits, then America, and the Nazis would have won that
war.
Had Hitler not made that mistake and invaded England in 1940 or 1941, instead,
there would have been no England for the United States and the Brits to use as
a staging ground to prepare an assault on Nazi Europe.
England would not have been able to run its North African campaign to help take
a little pressure off Russia while America geared up for battle, and today
Europe would very probably be run by the Nazis, the Third Reich, and, isolated
and without any allies (not even the Brits).
The United States would very likely have had to cede Asia to the Japanese, who
were basically Nazis by another name then, and the world we live in today would
be very different and much worse.
I say this to illustrate that turning points in history are often dicey things.
And we are now at another one.
There is a very dangerous minority in Islam that either has or wants to have,
and may soon have the ability to deliver small nuclear, biological, or chemical
weapons, almost anywhere in the world, unless it is prevented from doing so.
France, Germany, and Russia, have been selling these Islamic nations weapons
technology at least as recently as 2002, as have North Korea, Syria, and
Pakistan, paid for with billions of dollars that Saddam Hussein skimmed from
the "Oil For Food" program administered by the United Nations with
the complicity of Kofi Annan and his son.
The Jihadis, or the militant Muslims, are basically Nazis in Kaffiyahs.
They believe that Islam, a radically conservative (definitely not liberal) form
of Wahhabi Islam, should own and control the Middle East first, then Europe and
then the world. All who do not bow to Allah should be killed, enslaved,
or subjugated. They want to finish the Holocaust, destroy Israel, and
purge the world of Jews. This is what they say.
There is also a civil war raging in the Middle East for the most part not a hot
war, but a war of ideas. Islam is having its Inquisition and its
Reformation today, but it is not yet known which will win the Inquisition, or
the Reformation.
If the Inquisition wins, then the Wahhabis, or the Jihadis, will control the
Middle East, and the OPEC oil, and the United States, European, and Asian
economies the techno-industrial economies will be at the mercy of OPEC.
This is not an OPEC dominated by the well
educated and rational Saudis of today, but an OPEC dominated by the Jihadis.
You want gas in your car? You want heating oil next winter? You
want jobs? You want the dollar to be worth anything? You better
hope the Jihad, the Muslim Inquisition, loses, and the Islamic Reformation
wins.
If the Reformation movement wins, that is the moderate Muslims who believe that
Islam can respect and tolerate other religions and live in peace with the rest
of the world, move out of the 10th Century into the 21st Century. Then
the troubles in the Middle East will eventually
fade away, and a moderate and prosperous Middle East will emerge.
We have to help the Reformation win, and to do that we have to fight the
Inquisition, i.e., the Wahhabi movement, the Jihad, Al Qaeda, the Islamic
terrorist movements.
We have to do it somewhere, we cannot do it just anywhere and we cannot do it
everywhere at once.
We have created a focal point for the battle now at the time and place of our
choosing, in Iraq. Not in New York, not in London, or Paris, or Berlin,
but in Iraq, where we did and are doing two very important things:
(1) We deposed Saddam Hussein and whether Saddam
Hussein was directly involved in 9/11 or not the issue. It is undisputed
that Saddam has been actively supporting the terrorist movement for decades,
Saddam is a terrorist. Saddam is, or was, a weapon of mass destruction,
who is responsible for the deaths of probably more than a million Iraqis and
two million Iranians.
(2) We created a battle, a confrontation, a flash
point, with Islamic terrorism in Iraq and we have focused the battle. We
are killing bad guys there, and the ones we get there we won't have to get
here, or anywhere else. We also have a good shot at creating a Dmocratic,
peaceful Iraq, which will be a catalyst for democratic change in the rest of
the Middle East, and an outpost for a stabilizing American military presence in
the Middle East for as long as it is needed.
The Euros could have done this, but they didn't, and they won't. We now know
that rather than opposing the rise of the Jihad, the French, Germans, and
Russians were selling them arms. We have found more than a million tons
of weapons and munitions in Iraq. If Iraq was not a threat to anyone, why
did Saddam need a million tons of weapons?
Additionally, Iraq was paying for French, German, and Russian arms with money
skimmed from the United Nations Oil for Food Program (supervised by U.N.
Secretary General Kofi Annan and his son) that was supposed to pay for
food, medicine, and education, for Iraqi children.
World War II, the war with the German and Japanese Nazis, really began with a
''whimper'' in 1928. It did not begin with Pearl Harbor. It began with
the Japanese invasion of China. It was at war for fourteen years before
America joined in it. It officially ended in 1945 a 17 year war and was
followed by another decade of United States occupation in Germany and Japan to
get those countries reconstructed and running on their own again a 27 year war.
World War II cost the United States an amount equal to approximately a
full year's GNP adjusted for inflation, equal to about $12 trillion dollars.
World War II cost America more than 400,000 killed in action, and nearly
100,000 are still missing in action.
The Iraq war has so far cost the United States about $120 billion, which is
roughly what 9/11 cost New York. It has also cost about 1,000 American
lives, which is roughly 1/3 of the 3,000 lives that the Jihad snuffed on 9/11.
But the cost of not fighting and winning World War II would have been
unimaginably greater, a world that would now be dominated by German and
Japanese Nazism.
Americans have a short attention span, now, conditioned I suppose by 30 minute
television shows and 2 hour movies in which everything comes out okay.
The real world is not like that. It is messy, uncertain, and
sometimes bloody and ugly. It always has been, and probably always will
be.
If we do this thing in Iraq successfully, it is probable that the Reformation
will ultimately prevail. Many Muslims in the Middle East hope it will.
We will be there to support it. It has begun in some countries,
Libya, for instance also Dubai and Saudi Arabia. If we fail, the
Inquisition will probably prevail, and terrorism from Islam will be with us for
all the foreseeable future, because the people of the Inquisition, or Jihad,
believe that they are called by Allah to
kill all the Infidels, and that death in Jihad is glorious.
The bottom line here is that we will have to deal with Islamic terrorism until
we defeat it, whenever that is. It will not go away on its own. It will
not go away if we ignore it. If the United States can create a reasonably
democratic and stable Iraq, then we have an ''England'' in the Middle East, a
platform from which we can work to help modernize and moderate the Middle East.
The history of the world is the clash between the forces of relative
civility and civilization, and the barbarians clamoring at the gates.
The Iraq war is merely another battle in this ancient and never-ending war.
And now, for the first time ever, the barbarians are about to get nuclear
weapons unless we or somebody does prevent them.
The Iraq war is expensive, and uncertain, yes. But the consequences of
not fighting it and winning it will be horrifically greater. We have four
options:
1. We can defeat the Jihad now, before it gets
nuclear weapons.
2. We can fight the Jihad later, after it gets
nuclear weapons (which may be as early as next year, if Iran's progress on
nuclear weapons is what Iran claims it is).
3. We can surrender to the Jihad and accept its
dominance in the Middle East, now, in Europe in the next few years or decades,
and ultimately in America.
4. Or we can stand down now, and pick up the
fight later when the Jihad is more widespread and better armed, perhaps after
the Jihad has dominated France and Germany and maybe most of the rest of
Europe. It will be more dangerous, more expensive, and much bloodier
then.
Yes, the Jihadis say that they look forward to an Islamic America. If you
oppose this war, I hope you like the idea that your children, or grandchildren,
may live in an Islamic America under the Mullahs and the Sharia, an America
that resembles Iran today.
We can be defeatist, as many Democrats and liberals, peace activists, and
anti-war types seem to be, and concede or surrender to the Jihad or we can do
whatever it takes to win this war against them.
The history of the world is the history of civil clashes, or cultural clashes.
All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization
should be like and the most determined always win. Those who are willing to be
the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the
anti-pacifists kill them.
In the 20th Century it was western democracy vs. communism, and before
that western democracy vs. Nazism, and before that Western democracy vs.
German imperialism. Western democracy won, three times, but it wasn't
cheap, fun, nice, easy, or quick. Indeed, the wars against German
Imperialism (World War I), Nazi Imperialism (World War II), and
communist imperialism (the 40-year Cold War that included the Vietnam Battle,
commonly called the Vietnam War, but itself a major battle in a larger war)
covered almost the entire century.
The first major war of the 21st Century is the war between Western
Judeo/Christian Civilization and Wahhabi Islam. It may last a few more
years, or most of this century. It will last until the Wahhabi branch of
Islam fades away, or gives up its ambitions for regional and global dominance
and Jihad, or until Western Civilization gives in to the Jihad.
Remember, perspective is everything, and America's schools teach too little
history. The Cold War lasted from about 1947 to 1989 at least until the
Berlin Wall came down in 1989. Forty-two years. Europe spent the first
half of the 19th century fighting Napoleon, and from 1870 to 1945 fighting
Germany. World War II began in 1928, lasted 17 years, plus a ten year
occupation and the United States still has troops in Germany and Japan.
World War II resulted in the death of more than 50 million people, maybe
more than 100 million people, depending on which estimates you accept.
The United States has taken a little more than
1,000 Killed-in-Action (KIA) in Iraq. The United States took more than
4,000 KIA on the morning of June 6, 1944, the first day of the Normandy Invasion
to rid Europe of Nazi imperialism. In World War II the United States
averaged 2,000 KIA a week for four years. Most of the individual
battles of World War II lost more Americans than the entire Iraq war has done
so far.
But the stakes are at least as high: a world dominated by representative
governments with civil rights, human rights, and personal freedoms--or a world
dominated by a radical Islamic Wahhabi movement, and by the Jihad, under the
Mullahs and the Sharia.
I do not understand why many Americans do not grasp this. Too much
television I guess.
Many Americans profess to be in favor of human rights, civil rights, liberty,
freedom, and all that. But not for Iraqis, I guess. In America, but
nowhere else. The 300,000 Iraqi bodies in mass graves in Iraq, not our problem.
The United States population is about twelve times that of Iraq, so let's
multiply 300,000 by twelve. What would you think if there were 3,600,000
American bodies in mass graves in America because of our president? Would
you not want another country to help liberate America?
''Peace Activists'' always seem to demonstrate where it's safe and ineffective
to do so: in America. Why don't we see peace activists demonstrating in
Iran, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, and North Korea; in the places in the world that
really need peace activism the most?
Are we not supposed to be in favor of human rights, civil rights, democracy,
multiculturalism, diversity, etc? Well, if the Jihad wins and wherever
the Jihad wins, it is the end of civil rights, human rights, democracy,
multiculturalism, diversity, etc. Americans who oppose the liberation of
Iraq are coming down on the side of their own worst enemy. If the Jihad
wins, it is the death of ALL OTHER "ISM'S!"
Too many Americans JUST DON'T GET IT!
I TRULY BELIEVE THE ABOVE TO BE A MOST REALISTIC THREAT, NOT TO THE
REPUBLICAN NOR DEMOCRATIC PARTY, BUT, FAR MORE IMPORTANT....TO OUR CHILDREN,
GRANDCHILDREN, DEAR FRIENDS AND ALL FELLOW AMERICANS!!!
About the Writer: Raymond Kraft is a lawyer and writer living and working in
Northern California. Raymond receives e-mail at rskraft@vfr.net.